"Consent" is something the police request if they have no probable cause. Once you shoot at police, you can be searched, your present property can be searched and you don't have a leg to stand on. AntiFa believes they're all jailhouse lawyers, but what they've proven is they're idiots who can't do basic research.
Terry vs Ohio only ruled that police can stop and frisk someone for weapons without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous." It's less than a full search, but of course, that frisk may develop probable cause for a full-blown search.
I can't count how many arrests that I made pursuant to Terry that in the end had no weapon involved. The frisk in itself may have developed no further evidence to pursue. You really don't know how this works in real life, do you? You're using Wikipedia, aren't you?
Those "No Kings" protests are a conduit for spreading Leftist lies. It's disturbing that $114,000 has been raised for theses Antifa criminals on GiveSendGo. I used to think that GiveSendGo was for Conservative causes. I'm glad you educated me about that.
GiveSendGo wants to allow people to fundraise for their legal defense — okay, fair. But these Antifa members have now been convicted of terrorism crimes.
"You have the right to swing first, but if you do swing, any moves you make can and will be used as an excuse to beat the shit out of you. You have the right to the presence of an undertaker and a priest." I forget the rest.
- - Bibb County (Georgia) Sheriff's Office, ca. 1976
"Consent" is something the police request if they have no probable cause. Once you shoot at police, you can be searched, your present property can be searched and you don't have a leg to stand on. AntiFa believes they're all jailhouse lawyers, but what they've proven is they're idiots who can't do basic research.
A lack of probable cause does not prohibit a police search without consent. Police 'suspicion' need only be reasonable. Terry v Ohio
Terry vs Ohio only ruled that police can stop and frisk someone for weapons without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous." It's less than a full search, but of course, that frisk may develop probable cause for a full-blown search.
I can't count how many arrests that I made pursuant to Terry that in the end had no weapon involved. The frisk in itself may have developed no further evidence to pursue. You really don't know how this works in real life, do you? You're using Wikipedia, aren't you?
True, but the request is made when there is neither, not when one or the other is present. Thank you for clarifying.
Those "No Kings" protests are a conduit for spreading Leftist lies. It's disturbing that $114,000 has been raised for theses Antifa criminals on GiveSendGo. I used to think that GiveSendGo was for Conservative causes. I'm glad you educated me about that.
GiveSendGo wants to allow people to fundraise for their legal defense — okay, fair. But these Antifa members have now been convicted of terrorism crimes.
"You have the right to swing first, but if you do swing, any moves you make can and will be used as an excuse to beat the shit out of you. You have the right to the presence of an undertaker and a priest." I forget the rest.
- - Bibb County (Georgia) Sheriff's Office, ca. 1976