14 Comments
User's avatar
Rose Webster's avatar

We are being held hostage by these terrorists. They threaten judges, politicians and general public. I lived in western Washington State for years and they have always been a problem. I recently moved away and that is not a solution. They should all be tarred and feathered for starters. Transtifa is the worst as they are very unbalanced! Thank you Andy for your continued reporting.

Richard Luthmann's avatar

Judges cannot be threatened for imposing sentences. Police cannot be shot in the neck and then have the attackers sanitized as “demonstrators.” Courts cannot function if extremist networks believe adverse rulings justify doxxing, assassination fantasies, or street vengeance. The First Amendment protects ugly speech, radical politics, and harsh criticism of judges. It does not protect true threats, criminal conspiracy, material support, or intimidation meant to obstruct justice. Federal authorities should investigate every credible threat, identify organizers, follow the money, and protect the courts. If Antifa does not exist, why does it keep leaving defendants, weapons, victims, and threat networks behind?

Ute Heggen's avatar

And Senators Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, will they condemn these terrorists? Note that Clinton advisor, James Carville, from decades past, says he's not in this party any more. His new favorite word is schism. Interesting how religious these atheists become.

Andy Ngo's avatar

They were quiet when Democrats incited violence against the Supreme Court justices.

Kelly Harbeson's avatar

I am reading Mollie Hemingway's "Alito" which addresses that very incident

John Carlson's avatar

Hunt them down, put them on trial, convict them, lock them up and toss the key into the abyss.

Kelly Harbeson's avatar

In a free society with the 1st Ammendment, it is difficult to convict someone who has not committed a crime, but only hopes to do so. This is why EVERYONE should carry, train and keep their heads on swivels. Civil War is coming, and if the normies aren't ready for it we are likely lose a lot on our side when the balloon goes up!

Verge's avatar

One F-4 and about three hours and it would be over.

Kelly Harbeson's avatar

As the bullet said to the A-bomb, "I prefer the personal touch"

Edie Faylor's avatar

Is it not against the law to threaten judges? Will there be any action taken against these folks?

Sarcastia's avatar

Andy, you're so far ahead of the pack you're three quarters of the way around the track before they have their shoelaces tied.

It's never nice to threaten judges, and it's particularly unwise to threaten Texas judges. Add in the use of interstate comms to make such threats and it quickly begins to paint a picture of more opportunities for Texas Judges and Juries to send that 'special message' to those who seek to harm or terrorize others.

Meanwhile, I'd be greatly interested to know what Blue Sky administrators have to say about their role in facilitating and providing a platform for such illegal activities.

They'd no doubt be eager to speak with you, I'm sure. 😼

Bill Swickard's avatar

Perhaps they will round them (Antifa followers) all up for another courtroom drama concluding in striped outerwear. Texas has some pretty good ropers. I am certain they travel, if needed. Do you hear the "Yee-haw", yet?

SSGJOHNZO's avatar

On Blue Sky, try posting that “there are only two genders”, and see how long it takes for them to kick you off. However, threaten the life of a federal judge and you may hear the crickets chirping.

Verge's avatar

I seriously wonder how many of these people are just mentally retarded. I mean, they just watched what happens when you threaten federal officials. Then they do it themselves, through a platform where their identities are easily traceable. Love it!! Give us more reasons to arrest and incarcerate you!!