I write as a trans widow, that is a woman who married a seemingly normal husband. Then he went down the rabbit hole of trans identification. And trees were not trees, bees were not bees.
Thanks. I'd love to come on your channel and put all the data out there. I have to warn young women who are married to a man suddenly "identifying" that it is not safe to stay. If I added the women whose crossdressing, porn-addicted husbands to my data on 74 of us, we'd have well over 40% physical assaults. If we added the men who killed others, close to 50%. You are so right, Andrew. Take good care.
You have nailed it. There is no such thing as "trans". Mammals can make (or could make if not damaged in some way) either large immobile gametes (eggs) = female. OR they can make small, mobile gametes (sperm) = male. No mammal of ANY kind has ever magically, chemically, surgically or through any other means been able to change that. All the talk about frogs or other creatures that can change their sex is simply not applicable to mammals.
The tragedy of gender ideology is that it is a lie and the people that are hurt the most are the ones who believe it.
Thanks. I suggest you write this as a reply to Jeffrey Peoples, below also. He's got the kahones to insult me about this. He insults 73 other trans widows and 3 murdered wives in addition to me.
I can understand how that can be it just didn’t enter your consciousness that you could be exposed to someone that you could never have dreamed up. Mine was the opposite political direction in 1978 and the trajectory of that person was horrifying and until this year I had never read the newspaper over the event. I had to take 3 children and get in the car and leave protected by the sheriffs dept. my brain just couldn’t have come up with that. I’m sorry you had to go through that.
Did he identify as "trans?" If so, please contact me through my channel, Trans Widow Ute Heggen. in any case, I understand and have other stories of women who had this exit
Calling yourself a "trans widow" is a bit like someone calling themselves a "black widow" or a "white widow" or a "gay widow" or a "straight widow" or a "redhead widow." I recognize that there are probably some awful people who are trans, but what makes them awful isn't the fact that they are trans, just like what makes white people who are awful isn't the fact that they are white. What you are producing is something that will likely contribute to bigoted antipathy toward people who are trans, such as myself.
The ideology of the dominant trans cult though arguably does contribute the awfulness of many people who are trans unfortunately. But the solution to that problem is not to stigmatize trans people, but to stigmatized the cult that has acquired much of the mindshare among people who are trans. Part of the reason why the cult has acquired the mindshare it has I suspect is because the cult established itself as a "refuge" for trans people while much of society viewed trans people with revulsion and fear. If there is no other social groups other than the dominant trans cult that provides a refuge for trans people, the cult will continue to grow. What you produced will unfortunately feed the cult, not starve it.
trans widow is a term not invented by me but in the common colloquial. See the documentary, Behind the Looking Glass, by Indian filmmaker, Vaishnavi Sundar.
Why would you ask me this? I have nothing to do with the N word I worked 3 jobs, took my son who wanted to kill himself by jumping off the top of his school to a court qualified psychologist (and his trans identified father refused to attend) for months and I worked to pay for. It does matter whether I've invented it or not because I've been accused of using my situation to GRIFT. Thus, I make sure to state that I only use this term because it arose naturally, in language. This is my fist day here. FU 2.
I was using it as a comparison to get you to possibly understand the social impact of its usage and the irrelevance of its origins. I did not intend it as a "fuck you". So "FU2" doesn't make sense. I understand my comparison is jarring. That was intended. But it's true. Sometimes the truth is jarring.
As another jarring comparison. I have a parable.
A white woman was married to a black man. They had a child and the the child was very distraught to the point of suicide. The father didn't care. And he didn't work. The black father went out every night to bars and got drunk and had sex with hookers. He also got heavily involved with the Black Panthers. The white woman worked hard every day and night to take care of the family. Eventually the son was about to kill himself by jumping off a building and the mother was fortunately there to talk him off the building and she brought him to a psychotherapist. The mother got a divorce. The white woman then wrote a book of stories from other white woman who had ordeals with black husbands and divorced them. She titled the book "black widow." When a black man in a substack comment section with quite a few people who probably have prejudices against black people pointed out the bigotry that the title suggests, the white woman told him fuck you and told him how she worked day and night while his black husband fucked hookers and hung out with thugs and his son tried to commit suicide and it was her first day here promoting her book "black widow" and that "black widow" is a common way of referring to white women who were once married to black men.
Think of another term as a short hand, and I will try to promote it, and give you credit for the term, Jeffrey Peoples. I've already tried. Do you know about the murders of Olesya Sinkova, Jennifer Anderson and Beverly Guenther by their crossdressing husbands as they, all three, tried to leave? Look up that and more at reduxx.org.
Why do you think there should be a shorthand at all? Reread my parable. I have no problem with people disparaging the current dominant transgender cult ideology, just as I would have no problem people disparaging BLM ideology. My criticism is based on the fact that your conception of trans people seems to me to suggest a model with a causal connection between being trans and immorality / criminality -- im basing that judgement on your video about your book and the documentary you shared.
Do you understand the distinction between being trans and the common ideology of most trans activists? If "trans widow" had a similar connotation as "golf widow" my judgement would not be what it is, but to me " trans widow" comes across, based on those two sources I gave, more like what I portray in my parable about "black widow."
What are the murders by the 3 cross dressing husbands supposed to be evidence of? If someone brought up 3 murders by non cross dressing husbands, would that be different?
My concern is antifa is going to change tactics. Start using bombs, fire, up close shootings, up close stabbings, suicide bombings, etc. Anything is on the table with these people.
Andy, regarding a comment you made, the UK media has changed over the past 4 or so years. It's essentially every bit as corrupt as the US. The BBC and Sky have "both sides" panels where each side says things about Trump that would make even MSNBC gasp.
from yesterday, the "Conservative" on Sky said: "I wonder if Trump even has the intelligence to realize everyone is playing him? I doubt it." Meanwhile, the BBC had 5 hardcore leftists in studio and one (carefully curated) zero-charisma Trump defender via Zoom who was not allowed to finish a sentence by the in-studio gang during his occasional time (the BBC counted by attendees, not sides).
PS Post-news conference in London, the BBC had to admit to their viewers that they have not covered the autopen (treason) story, at all. They then said Kimmel is off the air by government decree, ignoring the role played by Nexstar and Sinclair, and said the UK government does not interfere with speech, shamelessly ignoring the thousands of actual arrests each year for social media comments that have nothing to do with protecting children.
Andy, thank you for your courage. You are truly fighting the good fight by attempting to uncover and report on a violent ideology and its adherents at personal risk to yourself. Hopefully, more will see the what you’ve painstakingly illuminated over the years.
Thank you Andy for your bravery and your excellent journalism. I watched your interview with Winston tonight and it really just cemented with me how important it is that we remain vigilant. Thank you so very much.
This was one of the best most honest interviews I’ve heard on what is really going on in dark America. My question is this, who is funding these groups? Do you think it’s large organizations like the Ford Foundation or is it the universities or is it all of the above?
I write as a trans widow, that is a woman who married a seemingly normal husband. Then he went down the rabbit hole of trans identification. And trees were not trees, bees were not bees.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHDK0y9GZrk&t=28s
I am so sorry.
Thanks. I'd love to come on your channel and put all the data out there. I have to warn young women who are married to a man suddenly "identifying" that it is not safe to stay. If I added the women whose crossdressing, porn-addicted husbands to my data on 74 of us, we'd have well over 40% physical assaults. If we added the men who killed others, close to 50%. You are so right, Andrew. Take good care.
I mean if I added the ones who murdered their wives, who I do not include in the data, as I don't have the rest of the details.
You have nailed it. There is no such thing as "trans". Mammals can make (or could make if not damaged in some way) either large immobile gametes (eggs) = female. OR they can make small, mobile gametes (sperm) = male. No mammal of ANY kind has ever magically, chemically, surgically or through any other means been able to change that. All the talk about frogs or other creatures that can change their sex is simply not applicable to mammals.
The tragedy of gender ideology is that it is a lie and the people that are hurt the most are the ones who believe it.
Don't let bamboozled people make you feel guilty.
Thanks. I suggest you write this as a reply to Jeffrey Peoples, below also. He's got the kahones to insult me about this. He insults 73 other trans widows and 3 murdered wives in addition to me.
He just needs to be blocked. He does not want to understand your point of view and is purposely trolling you.
I can understand how that can be it just didn’t enter your consciousness that you could be exposed to someone that you could never have dreamed up. Mine was the opposite political direction in 1978 and the trajectory of that person was horrifying and until this year I had never read the newspaper over the event. I had to take 3 children and get in the car and leave protected by the sheriffs dept. my brain just couldn’t have come up with that. I’m sorry you had to go through that.
Did he identify as "trans?" If so, please contact me through my channel, Trans Widow Ute Heggen. in any case, I understand and have other stories of women who had this exit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHDK0y9GZrk&t=35s
Calling yourself a "trans widow" is a bit like someone calling themselves a "black widow" or a "white widow" or a "gay widow" or a "straight widow" or a "redhead widow." I recognize that there are probably some awful people who are trans, but what makes them awful isn't the fact that they are trans, just like what makes white people who are awful isn't the fact that they are white. What you are producing is something that will likely contribute to bigoted antipathy toward people who are trans, such as myself.
The ideology of the dominant trans cult though arguably does contribute the awfulness of many people who are trans unfortunately. But the solution to that problem is not to stigmatize trans people, but to stigmatized the cult that has acquired much of the mindshare among people who are trans. Part of the reason why the cult has acquired the mindshare it has I suspect is because the cult established itself as a "refuge" for trans people while much of society viewed trans people with revulsion and fear. If there is no other social groups other than the dominant trans cult that provides a refuge for trans people, the cult will continue to grow. What you produced will unfortunately feed the cult, not starve it.
trans widow is a term not invented by me but in the common colloquial. See the documentary, Behind the Looking Glass, by Indian filmmaker, Vaishnavi Sundar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Frffv2sB8zE
What does it matter if you invented it or not? You didn't invent nigger either; are you going to call black people niggers?
Why would you ask me this? I have nothing to do with the N word I worked 3 jobs, took my son who wanted to kill himself by jumping off the top of his school to a court qualified psychologist (and his trans identified father refused to attend) for months and I worked to pay for. It does matter whether I've invented it or not because I've been accused of using my situation to GRIFT. Thus, I make sure to state that I only use this term because it arose naturally, in language. This is my fist day here. FU 2.
I was using it as a comparison to get you to possibly understand the social impact of its usage and the irrelevance of its origins. I did not intend it as a "fuck you". So "FU2" doesn't make sense. I understand my comparison is jarring. That was intended. But it's true. Sometimes the truth is jarring.
As another jarring comparison. I have a parable.
A white woman was married to a black man. They had a child and the the child was very distraught to the point of suicide. The father didn't care. And he didn't work. The black father went out every night to bars and got drunk and had sex with hookers. He also got heavily involved with the Black Panthers. The white woman worked hard every day and night to take care of the family. Eventually the son was about to kill himself by jumping off a building and the mother was fortunately there to talk him off the building and she brought him to a psychotherapist. The mother got a divorce. The white woman then wrote a book of stories from other white woman who had ordeals with black husbands and divorced them. She titled the book "black widow." When a black man in a substack comment section with quite a few people who probably have prejudices against black people pointed out the bigotry that the title suggests, the white woman told him fuck you and told him how she worked day and night while his black husband fucked hookers and hung out with thugs and his son tried to commit suicide and it was her first day here promoting her book "black widow" and that "black widow" is a common way of referring to white women who were once married to black men.
This has nothing to do with me, Jeffrey Peoples. Do your media empire not on comments replying to me. Thanks. Todah
Think of another term as a short hand, and I will try to promote it, and give you credit for the term, Jeffrey Peoples. I've already tried. Do you know about the murders of Olesya Sinkova, Jennifer Anderson and Beverly Guenther by their crossdressing husbands as they, all three, tried to leave? Look up that and more at reduxx.org.
Why do you think there should be a shorthand at all? Reread my parable. I have no problem with people disparaging the current dominant transgender cult ideology, just as I would have no problem people disparaging BLM ideology. My criticism is based on the fact that your conception of trans people seems to me to suggest a model with a causal connection between being trans and immorality / criminality -- im basing that judgement on your video about your book and the documentary you shared.
Do you understand the distinction between being trans and the common ideology of most trans activists? If "trans widow" had a similar connotation as "golf widow" my judgement would not be what it is, but to me " trans widow" comes across, based on those two sources I gave, more like what I portray in my parable about "black widow."
What are the murders by the 3 cross dressing husbands supposed to be evidence of? If someone brought up 3 murders by non cross dressing husbands, would that be different?
No he was opposite of that, but was a horror in the realization what he was like.
Mah zeh?
I don’t know what that means
Hebrew: "what?"
My concern is antifa is going to change tactics. Start using bombs, fire, up close shootings, up close stabbings, suicide bombings, etc. Anything is on the table with these people.
Pray to God for the protection and safety of Andy and all of the other truth tellers. This is a war between good and evil. Charlie knew that.
Yes. He definitely knew that.
You opened our eyes years ago & nearly lost your life to the evil of antifa. Now our sweet Charlie is gone because of them.
Thank you for sharing your story.
Andy, regarding a comment you made, the UK media has changed over the past 4 or so years. It's essentially every bit as corrupt as the US. The BBC and Sky have "both sides" panels where each side says things about Trump that would make even MSNBC gasp.
I probably have on rose-coloured glasses. Nothing seems as bad as MSNBC though, at least on BBC.
from yesterday, the "Conservative" on Sky said: "I wonder if Trump even has the intelligence to realize everyone is playing him? I doubt it." Meanwhile, the BBC had 5 hardcore leftists in studio and one (carefully curated) zero-charisma Trump defender via Zoom who was not allowed to finish a sentence by the in-studio gang during his occasional time (the BBC counted by attendees, not sides).
PS Post-news conference in London, the BBC had to admit to their viewers that they have not covered the autopen (treason) story, at all. They then said Kimmel is off the air by government decree, ignoring the role played by Nexstar and Sinclair, and said the UK government does not interfere with speech, shamelessly ignoring the thousands of actual arrests each year for social media comments that have nothing to do with protecting children.
Today, after the synagogue attack in London, the BBC ran their mouths that the "Far Right" did it:
https://www.facebook.com/richard.cook.1848/videos/771057155731207?idorvanity=243331015137514
Andy, thank you for your courage. You are truly fighting the good fight by attempting to uncover and report on a violent ideology and its adherents at personal risk to yourself. Hopefully, more will see the what you’ve painstakingly illuminated over the years.
Wonderful interview with Winston Marshall
Thank you Andy for your bravery and your excellent journalism. I watched your interview with Winston tonight and it really just cemented with me how important it is that we remain vigilant. Thank you so very much.
This was one of the best most honest interviews I’ve heard on what is really going on in dark America. My question is this, who is funding these groups? Do you think it’s large organizations like the Ford Foundation or is it the universities or is it all of the above?
Thank you, this an excellent interview by two extremely thoughtful people
Well done, Andy. Winston's platform is huge and it is good to see you continue to have the influence and exposure you deserve.